aadimanav
07-17 05:39 PM
To - Congress (Capitol Hill, DC)
Purpose - To address EB3 visa issue.
How about wrapping the flowers in the following
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20190
or similar petition.
Thanks,
Purpose - To address EB3 visa issue.
How about wrapping the flowers in the following
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20190
or similar petition.
Thanks,
wallpaper very short hair cuts for lack
senk1s
10-10 07:21 PM
hopefully we'll get our receipts soon ...
very similar timeline like shams
very similar timeline like shams
dahai
03-10 05:14 PM
Hi,
My wife has received the ASC notice of biometric appointment. But I did not. She filed as dependent of my concurrent I-140 + I-485 case. I am wondering if there is anything wrong. Should we receive the notice together? Or it is normal to have seperate appointments? Then how long could be the interval between the notices? Anyone in the same situation before? Could I find it out by Infopass appointment?
Thanks!
My wife has received the ASC notice of biometric appointment. But I did not. She filed as dependent of my concurrent I-140 + I-485 case. I am wondering if there is anything wrong. Should we receive the notice together? Or it is normal to have seperate appointments? Then how long could be the interval between the notices? Anyone in the same situation before? Could I find it out by Infopass appointment?
Thanks!
2011 2010 Black Short Hairstyles
Macaca
12-07 10:30 AM
Holding the Hungry Hostage (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/opinion/07fri2.html) NY Editorial, December 7, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
more...
easygoer
01-13 03:15 PM
Thank you 'frommaija' for quick answer. I heard some wrong cases recently and wanted to make sure. Apreciate this.
Munshi75
11-09 05:57 PM
you should have your I-140 approved to claim your previous PD for future LC.
more...
zephyrr
07-18 11:29 PM
According to a FAQ on Murthy.com about the Yates memo, it is possible to switch jobs (using AC21) if 140 and 485 have both have been pending 180 days. Murthy doesn't advise this under normal circustances because if an RFE is received on the 140, then it is problematic if you've left the company.
2010 hairstyles Black very
upuaut
08-29 02:03 AM
in order to get the animation to 'stick' you have to toggle that button that says "animate" on the top of the screen. The reason they do it that way is this. If you've already set up an animation, but then find that you need to change something in the basic structure of the item, you can turn off that toggle, edit the item and have it not effect the animation that you set up.
more...
bijualex29
09-12 09:40 AM
Can a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions have the power to pass any kind of immigration bills.
hair very short
cscslow
07-25 01:38 PM
Does anyone know how slow/fast/better is the Counsular Processing back in India if you ever become eligible to do that?
Is itbetter than applying 485 here and waiting .......ZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz
Don't go for it. It may be fast but you are working with too many variables that may go wrong. I went back home last year for CP and suddenly I became a victim of retrogression. I missed my cutoff date by two days. Then I had to wait for about 3 months to get my H1 stamp. I was lucky that I didn't lose my job here.
Is itbetter than applying 485 here and waiting .......ZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz
Don't go for it. It may be fast but you are working with too many variables that may go wrong. I went back home last year for CP and suddenly I became a victim of retrogression. I missed my cutoff date by two days. Then I had to wait for about 3 months to get my H1 stamp. I was lucky that I didn't lose my job here.
more...
ivgclive
09-21 12:17 PM
D
hot 2010 short shaved hairstyles
quizzer
02-19 04:25 PM
My approved PERM and I140 (in process) were applied using the old cancelled pp.
I got a new passport last week.
Is there anything I need to do since i have the new PP now?
Gurus pls advice.
Regards
I got a new passport last week.
Is there anything I need to do since i have the new PP now?
Gurus pls advice.
Regards
more...
house 2010 \\\\quot;Women in the Czech
GCLONGWAIT
10-06 11:57 PM
Would appreciate the right info on the above
tattoo Very short best haircuts,
sapota
11-15 11:26 AM
on a lot of things like your priority date, country of birth, EB category. But bottomline is this : Its gonna take much longer than you think.
more...
pictures very short hair cuts for lack
franklin
05-04 10:53 AM
Hey there
Can someone point me to a resource that will allow me to quickly colate info on positive and negative bills for us. Specifically (right now) ones in the Senate.
I posted about this yesterday, but my post vanished :eek:
Can someone point me to a resource that will allow me to quickly colate info on positive and negative bills for us. Specifically (right now) ones in the Senate.
I posted about this yesterday, but my post vanished :eek:
dresses hairstyles On short black hairstyles short hairstyles for black women. short
HereIComeGC
03-17 04:28 PM
Few days back, I saw a thread for Poll for how many EB2 Cases are pending per year. Now I can't find it. Can anyone please point me to it?
more...
makeup pixie cut for lack women
aim-high
08-14 08:48 AM
I have currently applied for GC under EB3. Got a new job offer in a different state and planning to take up the new job offer. For AC-21, what are the docs/forms required ?
Do I have to do anything special because I am moving to a different state ?
Do I have to do anything special because I am moving to a different state ?
girlfriend 2011 Women have some facial short hairstyles for black women. hairstyles for
Aah_GC
07-27 03:24 PM
Dude / Dudette.. I dont work for MSFT but the general thing is .. wait for 180 calender days post your I485 and make a move using AC21. You don't have any provisions to move with AC21 anyways. Take it easy.
hairstyles very short hair cuts for lack
akela_topchi
01-21 04:09 PM
Dear friends,
Can a person with following qualification file in EB2? Do you foresee issues like RFE/rejection?
3 Yr B.Com + 2 Yr MBA + 3 Yr MCA .. all foreign degrees. + 1 year of progresive experience.
Can you also suggest/comment on following? -
- Are there any finer-points in various forms that require some specific words/info?
- new OTC job band changes - would it affect this case in any ways?
- Education Evaluation - can you please recommend any good evaluator.. better if somebody who has successfully handled similar cases?
Thanks for your valuable inputs!
Can a person with following qualification file in EB2? Do you foresee issues like RFE/rejection?
3 Yr B.Com + 2 Yr MBA + 3 Yr MCA .. all foreign degrees. + 1 year of progresive experience.
Can you also suggest/comment on following? -
- Are there any finer-points in various forms that require some specific words/info?
- new OTC job band changes - would it affect this case in any ways?
- Education Evaluation - can you please recommend any good evaluator.. better if somebody who has successfully handled similar cases?
Thanks for your valuable inputs!
twife
09-14 02:27 PM
Hi ,
My husband has a conviction for domestic violence. he was not jailed but is under probation. he is on h1b visa and i am on h4. his i140 was approved before the conviction. also both our visa extension were approved prior to that. currently visa stamp in both our passport has expired but we have valid i-94. i need to visit india for urgent family health issue. if i go i will need to get a new stamp. Can his arrest result in my visa getting denied at consulate. Or will it create any problems for me at port of entry?. he is not going to travel with me
Thanks in advance for ur help
My husband has a conviction for domestic violence. he was not jailed but is under probation. he is on h1b visa and i am on h4. his i140 was approved before the conviction. also both our visa extension were approved prior to that. currently visa stamp in both our passport has expired but we have valid i-94. i need to visit india for urgent family health issue. if i go i will need to get a new stamp. Can his arrest result in my visa getting denied at consulate. Or will it create any problems for me at port of entry?. he is not going to travel with me
Thanks in advance for ur help
sridom
04-01 10:17 AM
IV Team,
I'd filed my concurrent EB2 I140+I485 on Aug 17, 2007 at the Texas Service Center. I have been trying to check the status of my I140 petition online for the last 3-4 months. Every time i try to do so, i get the following error message:
"Case Status Retrieval Failed. This Receipt Number cannot be found at this time in this automated system"
Am I the only one with this problem ? or are there others experiencing the same issue ?
Kindly reply.
Thanks
-Sridom
I'd filed my concurrent EB2 I140+I485 on Aug 17, 2007 at the Texas Service Center. I have been trying to check the status of my I140 petition online for the last 3-4 months. Every time i try to do so, i get the following error message:
"Case Status Retrieval Failed. This Receipt Number cannot be found at this time in this automated system"
Am I the only one with this problem ? or are there others experiencing the same issue ?
Kindly reply.
Thanks
-Sridom
No comments:
Post a Comment