smsthss
08-10 10:06 PM
Hi all,
I received an I-485 RFE for me and my spouse on July 28th. For the primary applicant it was Employment verification letter (currently dated letter from employer describing duties,position and salary info) and for my wife it was about proof of bonafide marriage.
My attorney replied to RFE on Aug 6th with necessary evidence and EVL.
Online status for both of us changed today Aug 10th from RFE SENT to RESPONSE TO RFE RECEIVED AND CASE PROCESSING RESUMED.
Hope this info is helpful in estimating time for people in similar situations.
PD DEC 04 EB3 I . Whats next ??
I received an I-485 RFE for me and my spouse on July 28th. For the primary applicant it was Employment verification letter (currently dated letter from employer describing duties,position and salary info) and for my wife it was about proof of bonafide marriage.
My attorney replied to RFE on Aug 6th with necessary evidence and EVL.
Online status for both of us changed today Aug 10th from RFE SENT to RESPONSE TO RFE RECEIVED AND CASE PROCESSING RESUMED.
Hope this info is helpful in estimating time for people in similar situations.
PD DEC 04 EB3 I . Whats next ??
wallpaper Disney Coloring Pages Tangled.
sukisharma
07-21 10:46 AM
There is a mistake in my 485 cover letter. The letter states that I am EB3 but actually I am EB2.
Will this cause any problem? Will USCIS deny my case? Please note we included I-140 approval form in the file.
Many thanks.
Will this cause any problem? Will USCIS deny my case? Please note we included I-140 approval form in the file.
Many thanks.
sathish_gopalan
02-08 09:11 PM
Guys. Is this 7% country limit a hard or soft one ?. Assuming 1,40,000 total immigrant visas, India would get 7% of it and that is 9800. Then you have the preference category. Assuming there are unused immigrant visas from other countries, how do they get allocated ?. Does anyone has clear idea ?.
2011 free coloring pages tangled. Coloring pages, pascal at
trgtc
January 25th, 2005, 05:18 PM
Nice shot, Freddy.
But clearly NOT "the end of the world".... I can see mountains off in the distance, on the left.
Time to climb another mountain....
Jon
trgtc
But clearly NOT "the end of the world".... I can see mountains off in the distance, on the left.
Time to climb another mountain....
Jon
trgtc
more...
johnwright03
03-04 09:58 PM
Folks,
My wife got terminated on Feb 13th, she received her last pay stub on Feb 20th...We haven't applied for a COS till date...Is she now out of Status..??? She was waiting on her last paystub before she can apply for a COS and she received around 24th of last month and now we are all ready to send our documentation for COS to USCIS. During this span of 2 weeks is she considered staying illegal here..??
I was reading somewhere if USCIS receives her COS after her employer h1b revocation, she might be denied her COS...Is this true...??? Please Advise.
I was also reading somewhere about e-filing for COS, is e-filing available for H1 to H4 COS..??
Thanks.
My wife got terminated on Feb 13th, she received her last pay stub on Feb 20th...We haven't applied for a COS till date...Is she now out of Status..??? She was waiting on her last paystub before she can apply for a COS and she received around 24th of last month and now we are all ready to send our documentation for COS to USCIS. During this span of 2 weeks is she considered staying illegal here..??
I was reading somewhere if USCIS receives her COS after her employer h1b revocation, she might be denied her COS...Is this true...??? Please Advise.
I was also reading somewhere about e-filing for COS, is e-filing available for H1 to H4 COS..??
Thanks.
JunRN
09-02 09:49 PM
If you're already eligible to use AC21, then I see no problem working as consultant as long as it is of the same job category as your LC. ATP and location does not matter anymore.
more...
Macaca
08-05 08:12 AM
A Bad Deal Gets Worse (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/opinion/05sun2.html) August 5, 2007
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
2010 makeup by pascal colouring pages free coloring pages tangled. coloring pages
Desertfox
06-15 11:17 AM
My employer is a single architect and owner of his sole proprietorship LLC firm and he filed an EB3 I-140 for me submitting the "Schedule-C" of his tax return, which shows a net profit of $57000 for the company. The prevailing wage for my architectural technician position is $35,100, and NSC is asking for my employer's personal financial documents, saying that they are not satisfied only with "Schedule-C" and �Net Profit� of his tax return and a sole-proprietor petitioner has to prove that he can sustain his household and the proffered wage. Can USCIS ask for personal finances when the net profit of the company is clearly greater than the prevailing wage? Has anyone been in the same situation? Any suggestions from the gurus?
more...
gimme_GC2006
10-09 08:44 PM
Sometime back there was a thread in IV where people predicted how many applications were processed based on the receipt numbers.
For eg, SRC-XX-XXX-XXXXX
Can anyone point me to the thread which explains what each digit means?
For eg, SRC-XX-XXX-XXXXX
Can anyone point me to the thread which explains what each digit means?
hair snowwhite coloring pages
arc
03-15 05:38 PM
Why you did not do the electronic filing?
anyone else, you help will be much appreciated...Thanks
anyone else, you help will be much appreciated...Thanks
more...
Blog Feeds
07-09 08:40 PM
Every once in a while a government agency in the immigration space does the right thing. If I'm to maintain credibility and objectivity in the eyes of readers, I need to call out functional behavior when I see it -- notwithstanding that this blog is dedicated to dysfunctions in the immigration ecosystem. The agency worthy of plaudits is a unit within the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice known as the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Employment Practices (OSC). Under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) � 274B(c) [8 U.S. Code � 1324b(c)], the OSC is charged, among...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/07/every-once-in-a-while-a-government-agency-in-the-immigration-space-does-the-right-thing-if-im-to-maintain-credibility-and-ob.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/07/every-once-in-a-while-a-government-agency-in-the-immigration-space-does-the-right-thing-if-im-to-maintain-credibility-and-ob.html)
hot disney coloring pages tangled.
Saralayar
08-04 09:27 PM
I saw an update in my case status on July 10th.
It says, RFE received and case reprocessing started..what does this mean?
anybody else has seen this?
Did you get any RFE and responded back to USCIS?. Then your status will change like this.
It says, RFE received and case reprocessing started..what does this mean?
anybody else has seen this?
Did you get any RFE and responded back to USCIS?. Then your status will change like this.
more...
house The Art of Tangled
Prashanthi
07-14 02:59 PM
I and my wife are on h1. I want to come on her h4. She recently applied for h1 extension as her employer is nonprofit org and has some policies of his own, he files every year. She filled in may�09 and got receipt number, as the case is still pending who we can apply for h4 now. Is there any way around to apply for my h4 while the case is still pending?
You can file your H-4 based on the H-1b receipt of your spouse, this is not a problem. They will approve your H-4 for the same duration as your spouses H-1, you will get an approval of H-4 only after your spouses H-1 is approved.
You can file your H-4 based on the H-1b receipt of your spouse, this is not a problem. They will approve your H-4 for the same duration as your spouses H-1, you will get an approval of H-4 only after your spouses H-1 is approved.
tattoo free coloring pages tangled.
desibechara
05-13 05:23 PM
Hi:
After at least 3 - 4 calls, over the last month, I finally spoke to IO at NSC. And she took my LIN numbers(other IOs did not even bothered). And then after 1 minute she replied that..my case is waiting to be assigned to Officer.
I even got my I140 checked but she was patient and told my HR that whole cas e is waitng to be assigned to Officer.
Is this something to be looking forward to or is it a usual reply?
Did anyone get this kind of reply?
DB
PD Oct29, 2001
concurrent I140, 485...FPS, EADs and Aps..are all received and getting dusty by now..
After at least 3 - 4 calls, over the last month, I finally spoke to IO at NSC. And she took my LIN numbers(other IOs did not even bothered). And then after 1 minute she replied that..my case is waiting to be assigned to Officer.
I even got my I140 checked but she was patient and told my HR that whole cas e is waitng to be assigned to Officer.
Is this something to be looking forward to or is it a usual reply?
Did anyone get this kind of reply?
DB
PD Oct29, 2001
concurrent I140, 485...FPS, EADs and Aps..are all received and getting dusty by now..
more...
pictures free coloring pages tangled.
aanakkoddan
07-06 06:27 PM
My LD 01/31/2003 I485 date 10/20/03 extending my EAD 4th time. Stuck in backlog center TX. Any one recently got from TX backlog?
dresses Disney Princess Coloring Pages
jayaprabha
08-19 01:30 AM
Hi
Completed my 6 years on H1B and returned back to India on personal reasons.
1. When I apply for a new H1B after 1 year break, does the H1B comes under the quota or will it be considered on previously held H1B quota.
2. How sure about getting approval of H1B.
Thanks.
Completed my 6 years on H1B and returned back to India on personal reasons.
1. When I apply for a new H1B after 1 year break, does the H1B comes under the quota or will it be considered on previously held H1B quota.
2. How sure about getting approval of H1B.
Thanks.
more...
makeup free coloring pages tangled. use coloring pages free in
forgerator
06-24 05:24 PM
1) Wrap up the backlog and introduce enough visas to make all categories EB2/EB3 current for everyone.
2) Eliminate this nonsense of H1 visa stamp. A person should be able to apply for visa while remaining in the US.
2) Eliminate this nonsense of H1 visa stamp. A person should be able to apply for visa while remaining in the US.
girlfriend tangled coloring pages to
gcforall99
04-02 11:24 PM
I received a RFE on 485 for a updated G-325 form and a Employment letter stating the Job details, Salary and if the Immigrant visa petition(labor certification) terms still exist. Iam a Jul,2007 filer, I have another 12 days to respond, this RFE was received by the company attorney. Now neither Employer/Company Attorney are responding to Phone calls/Emails regarding responding this to RFE. I do not understand what is their concern but came to know that few others from the same company got RFE on 485. Time is running out and if there is no response to the RFE, eventually the case will be denied. What are my options, Iam in my 4th year of my H1. I have a Valid EAD till Nov'2010 and H1 valid till Aug'2011. What will be my status if the 485 gets denied. Can I transfer the H1 to another employer and will need to start the GC process all over again ?
Any advice suggestions appreciated.
Thanks,
gcforall99
Any advice suggestions appreciated.
Thanks,
gcforall99
hairstyles Princess Coloring Pages
Kaianna
08-09 01:37 PM
Due to the big mess of July visa bulliten. Can I file multiple 485 cases to secure that one of my AOS case is accepted? Since once it is rejected due to improper filing, the next visa bulliten would be back to 2006 or 2005.
My situation is:
First I-485 case: I can file I-485 as principle applicant, and my spouse can file as dependent
plan to submit at the end of this week (Aug 11, 07).
Sencond I-485 case: My spouse can file as principle applicant based on his I-140, and I can file as dependent, plan to submit before Aug 17, 2007, with cover letter stating:
If the first AOS case based on xxx's I-140 is accepted, please withdraw the second AOS case based on YYY's I-140.
Is it doable? any potential issue? Thank you very much for your comments and advise. Urgent!!!
My situation is:
First I-485 case: I can file I-485 as principle applicant, and my spouse can file as dependent
plan to submit at the end of this week (Aug 11, 07).
Sencond I-485 case: My spouse can file as principle applicant based on his I-140, and I can file as dependent, plan to submit before Aug 17, 2007, with cover letter stating:
If the first AOS case based on xxx's I-140 is accepted, please withdraw the second AOS case based on YYY's I-140.
Is it doable? any potential issue? Thank you very much for your comments and advise. Urgent!!!
InTheMoment
06-18 07:57 PM
2 (a) is only if you have an approved I-140. In your case write "Concurrent filing of I-140/I-485 based on NIW"
Blog Feeds
07-27 03:40 PM
One of the comments on my post earlier today about the killed Border Patrol agent seemed pretty harsh - accusing most BP agents of being restrictionists with bad motives. I still think that's harsh and most Border Patrol agents are honestly out to do the necessary job of protecting our country's borders. But the timing of a major scandal involving Customs and Border Patrol certainly will make many people question just who the agency is hiring. According to the NY Times: After federal border agents detained several Mexican immigrants in western New York in June, an article about the incident...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/feds-investigating-border-patrol-agents-racist-web-posting.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/feds-investigating-border-patrol-agents-racist-web-posting.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment